Trends and Innovations in Philanthropy Roundtable 4/13

Join us for GCRI’s Trends and Innovations in Philanhropy roundtable on April 13, from 9:00-11:00am at the Institute for the Study and Practice of Nonviolence (265 Oxford Street), to learn more about promising practices and innovations in the field.  We’ll be looking at impact investing, changing the public perception of nonprofit “overhead,” social ventures, and collaborative approaches to nonprofit capacity building.

Inside Innovation Funding Webinar

Foundation Center’s Inside Innovation Funding: Exploring Philanthropy at the Intersection of Problem-Solving, Technology & Design Webinar
THURS, April 13, 1:30-3:00 PM  |  FREE

Increasingly funders are experimenting with innovation funding, but how are they defining innovation, and what can we learn from approaches that are working? Building on Foundation Center’s GrantCraft and Glasspockets blog series, funders will explain how they are applying and adapting strategies from the tech sector to strengthen and scale social sector endeavors. Topics covered will include competition grantmaking, accelerator programs, capacity building, and efforts to create a diverse and inclusive social innovation sector. Register ›

Women’s Fund Hosts Business and Labor Event

Women Leading Business & Labor Event 

GCRI member Women’s Fund of Rhode Island hosted a “Women Leading in Business & Labor” event with Senator Jack Reed on March 10. Over 100 women from across a variety of business sectors came to learn from Tejal Tarro of AWE and the RI Commission on Women & Girls; Jen Hetzel-Silbert of Opportunity@Work; Maureen Martin of the AFL-CIO and Sierra Barter of The Lady Project. Together with Senator Reed, the panelists shared innovative ways that businesses, nonprofit organizations and labor groups are working to get more women involved in non-traditional career paths and secure more representation in leadership roles at companies and in politics.  Senator Reed also shared the best ways to engage with legislators on important issues.

Listen for Good Initiative 2017 Grant Program Announced

The Fund for Shared Insight (FFSI) is a collaborative effort among funders that pools financial and other resources to make grants to improve philanthropy. FFSI emerged from the belief that foundations will be more effective and make an even bigger difference in the world if they are more open – if they share what they are learning and are open to what others want to share with them, including grantees and the people they seek to help.

The Fund for Shared Insight has several opportunities for your members to be involved in their Listen for Good initiative.  Listen for Good (L4G) is an initiative dedicated to building the practice of listening to the people funders seek to help. They invite nonprofits and funders to join in exploring a simple but systematic and rigorous way of getting feedback from the people at the heart of their work. Listen for Good is focused on applying a semi-standard survey instrument, which includes using the Net Promoter SystemSM (NPS®) employed widely in customer feedback circles, to the nonprofit beneficiary context. Organizations implementing L4G are all customer-facing nonprofits.

In 2016, FFSI made 46 L4G grants supported by 28 nominating co-funders. 2017 grantees of L4G will receive $45,000 over two years ($30,000 from Fund for Shared Insight and $15,000 from a nominating co-funder), as well as access to technical assistance to guide their implementation efforts.

Details 

FFSI is holding a series of open conference calls on April 7 and April to answer questions from potential co-funders about how to nominate a grantee(s) for Listen for Good. FFSI created a page about Listen for Good called “Information for Funders” with details on Listen for Good and how to nominated grantees.

GEO Fellowship Program for Change Leaders in Philanthropy

Grantmakers for Effective Organizations (GEO) is soliciting applications for its Change Leaders in Philanthropy Fellowship — GEO’s 10-month peer cohort program designed specifically for executives — helps participants work together to identify promising practices and recommendations for creating organizational conditions that support nonprofit success.

Eligible participants in the Change Leaders in Philanthropy Fellowship are executives who:

  • Work at grantmaking organizations that are GEO members
  • Report directly to the CEO, and
  • Are responsible for leading and/or supporting change in their organizations.

GEO will be hosting informational webinars on April 18 and April 20 to provide an overview of the fellowship’s structure and goals, as well as an opportunity for interested individuals to hear and learn directly from program facilitators and current cohort participants. Apply for the Change Leaders in Philanthropy Fellowship 

If you have questions about the fellowship, please contact Heather Peeler at peeler@geofunders.org or 202.355.9537 or Stephanie Chan at chan@geofunders.org or 202.355.9535.

Funder Guidelines for Taking a Public Stand

In the current political environment, many organizations have been asked by different constituents to speak up on policies, legislation and societal trends.  Many funders have developed a great deal of social capital and public trust from their work on social issues, and their voices can lend weight and import to policy discussions.  At the same time, they need to navigate legal parameters and weigh the cost benefit analysis to their vocal engagement on particular issues.

This article from Community Wealth Partners advises funders to think about three key questions in deciding whether to use their standing and influence on particular issues:

  • Will it advance your mission or cause?  Could the issue affect your desired outcomes?  Can you influence an audience that has power over the issue?
  • Are you the right messenger?  What is your role as a foundation?  Are you a credible source on this topic? Will speaking out support your stakeholders in a way they want to be supported?
  • Are you sharing the right message?  Do you have a clear purpose or call to action?  Are you communicating in a way that will resonate with your audience?

Read the full article

In addition, corporate leaders may find the article in Harvard Business Review on “What CEO’s Should Know About Speaking Up on Political Issues,” to be a source of valuable counsel as well.

Lessons from Multi-Sector Partnerships in the Health Sector

Report Details Important Lessons for Partnerships in All Issue Areas

ReThink Health, an initiative of Fannie E. Rippel Foundation, recently released a report on multi-sector partnerships to improve health, equity and economic well being.  Based on a nationwide survey of multi sector partnerships, the report details lessons learned from the work plans, finances and organizational development of these groups.

Some excerpted highlights that reinforce the message of GCRI’s Collective Impact panelists:

Challenges Based on Partnership Lifecycle

While most partnerships faced challenges related to collaborative infrastructure, sustainable financing, and data-sharing, other challenges were more prominent at certain phases, as are several distinctive momentum builders.

Earlier partnerships may face barriers in terms of “lack of authority and fragile infrastructure are special barriers in the Earlier phase, as partnerships establish their standing to lead change on chosen priorities. Groups in this phase tend to generate momentum by engaging multi-sector stakeholders and by building a region-wide vision around shared values.”

In the middle phases, partners may encounter “difficulties measuring progress and contending with political resistance…Their longer track record may raise expectations and they may have yet to negotiate all the vested interests that tend to reinforce the status quo. Experimenting and learning from easy wins gains special prominence as a practical way to drive progress.”

In more mature partnerships, their previous successes may actually be a challenge:  “Partnerships may have exhausted strategies that center primarily around win-win solutions or achievements that are perceived as low hanging fruit. They generate momentum more often by exercising influence upward and outward, as well as by taking a longer view of future scenarios.”

The report made several recommendations for successful partnership development:

All partnerships may benefit by having a wider view of the health ecosystem in their region, and by contributing toward a strategy for the region as a whole that will assure all of the vital conditions and services that people need through an organizational structure that best fits the local landscape. In addition, partnerships at each developmental phase may accelerate progress in different ways.

Earlier: Partnerships in the Earlier phase can set themselves up for success when they: (1) Articulate a region-wide vision based on shared values (both moral and economic); (2) Establish authority and expand engagement far as possible; and (3) Strengthen infrastructure through staff capacity, operational capability (e.g. backbone functions), and long-term financial planning.

Middle: Progress in the Middle phase may turn on building enough trust and transparency for more ambitious action as well as more difficult negotiations ahead. Groups may want to:  (1) Develop a compelling picture of the value they are poised to deliver; (2) Engage policymakers to create conditions that better enable regional action; and (3) Adopt a mindset for sustainable financing focused on creating new funding flows, especially ones that move beyond an excessive reliance on short-term grants, which often constrain the very ambitions and abilities that groups in the Middle phase need to succeed.

Later: To propel progress in the Later phase, we recommend that partnerships: (1) Surface vested interests and negotiate tough topics that otherwise threaten to reinforce the status quo; (2) Employ a learning practice that delivers evidence of results and is also tied to continuous learning, adaptation, and renewal; (3) Align with state and federal policy, such as changes in payment or regulatory systems; and (4) Establish new forms of distributed leadership, with a focus on broad-based coordination to avoid placing too much power in the hands of a few key players.

Considerations for Funders, Policymakers, and Other Allies

For funders, policymakers, and other allies who support multi-sector partnerships, we suggest the following activities:

• Learn about and consider developmental phases when crafting initiatives;

• Support long-term planning—extending over decades—so that strategies will persist through inevitable leadership transitions and adapt to change in wider contexts;

• Position grant funding as a bridge to more dependable financial structures.

• Fund core infrastructure and backbone organization, which can be decisive factors in the success of any multi-sector partnership.

Full report

Rhode Island KIDS COUNT – Fiscal Year 2018 Budget Analysis

KIDS COUNT Rhode Island Budget Analysis Available

Each year, Rhode Island KIDS COUNT provides an analysis of the governor’s proposed budget, detailing the potential impact on children and families.

Some highlights from the 2018 Analysis include:

  1. $1.1 million increase to the State Pre-K program for four-year-olds which, when combined with federal Preschool Expansion Grant funding, will enable Rhode Island to expand the State Pre-K program to serve over 1,000 children in 2017-2018.
  2. Funding for the Child Care Assistance Program (CCAP) to implement new federal rules designed to improve continuity of access to child care, specifically: a permanent graduated-phase out policy, 12 month continuous eligibility, 3 months of eligibility for families who lose their jobs to engage in job search, infant-toddler prioritization, and expanded outreach to homeless families.

Full Rhode Island KIDS COUNT FY 2018 Budget Analysis

Update to “Consumers Guide to Grants Management Software”

Revised Guide to Grants Management Software

Grants Managers Network, Idealware and Technology Affinity Group have announced the release of an update to the “Consumers Guide to Grant Management Systems.”  Because vendors are constantly improving their products between editions of the report, the report will now be published every six months to reflect new information and improvements.   This is a very useful resource if your organization is evaluating your current GMS or looking into new systems.  Download the Update